Blog WHS website

Updated Tentative Lists H1 2025

Every morning around 11 a.m. I do a quick check of this direct link to see whether UNESCO has registered any new Tentative Sites. When they do, I try to add the new records to our website as quickly as possible as well. The people in Paris rarely update before 11 a.m., and afternoon changes only occur when they have a lot to add. The Tentative Sites, for some reason, do not appear in chronological order – sometimes they post things that have been submitted months before. Let’s have a closer look at what the crop of the first half of 2025 brought us.

The Numbers

I have written about the trends in Tentative Sites before, trying to determine The Value of a TWHS. So does the first half of 2025 confirm this pattern?

At the time of writing (June 28, 2025), all Tentative Lists combined add up to 1778 sites. In the first half of 2025, 49 new Tentative Sites were added. 9 of those were 1-on-1 replacements of earlier ones. An additional 15 TWHS were removed and became Former TWHS.

49 new ones in the first half of the year are significantly above average, as are the 15 removals. The trend over the last 10 years was that an average of 66 new TWHS were added yearly, with a net result of 30; 66 were added, 14 removed, and 22 were inscribed and thus disappeared from the Tentative List as well. 

Full make-overs

Generally, it’s a steady trickle of new sites popping up. But now and then we see full make-overs, where countries are replacing their complete Tentative List. Countries generally don’t seem to like to drastically get rid of outdated entries; they just let them linger forever (looking at you, Egypt!).

  • Austria took a bold move in January and removed 8 of its 10 TWHS. It is working on a completely new Tentative List, with only the Iron Trail still in the queue for a WHC (Preliminary Assessment 2025, so 2029?).
  • Portugal did something similar, removing 7 older and vague entries from its list, such as the Route of Magellan and Sites of Globalization. But with 11 sites left, there is still plenty to choose from.
  • Algeria refreshed its full list last week. All 6 previous sites were renewed, but seem better defined now. The Royal Mausoleums of Ancient Algeria (photo 2) is its most urgent candidate, possibly going up for nomination in 2027. Also, they included 5 completely new sites, such as the fortified granaries (Ighamaouen) and Djurdjura National Park.
  • Guinea did a major update as well, although it couldn’t withstand holding on to some of the old ones. 4 new sites were added.

We also learned that New Zealand is seeking candidates for a new Tentative List; results are expected in 2026.

Notable individual new entries

When we look at the individual new entries, there’s a lot of preparation for upcoming nominations. We see:

Among the more imaginative new entries are:

Furthermore, India, China and Türkiye keep on adding and adding individual entries to their already long Tentative Lists without removing any.

Looking at the list of sites added in 2025, are there any Tentative Sites that stand out for you?

Els - 29 June 2025

Leave a comment

Comments

Ian Cade 29 June 2025

I had completely missed the Qatar National Museum.
It looks really interesting and I think something that does actually reflect the culture and financial power of the 21st century.


Twobaconsandaboston 29 June 2025

Thank you for your insight. Agree, there certainly large Tentative lists and I can see the local advantage of such. Some more to add to the planning.


Nan 29 June 2025

Yep: Adding to a tentative list is a virtue of itself. Turkey shows Tentative Sites on Location as Unesco sites.

Personally, I dont mind long tentative lists if the tentative sites are worthwhile. At least, in Turkey I found most of the tentative sites I visisted pretty great on their own merit. It's just that they are up for tough competition from the prior Turkish inscriptions.


Els Slots 29 June 2025

And regarding "why each state party does not progress existing TWHS to get their first inscribed site, rather than just adding to the Tentative List?" - in my earlier blog post The Value of a TWHS https://www.worldheritagesite.org/blog/id/498 I suggested that "These unrealistically long T Lists seem to serve mostly a domestic purpose: getting on a Tentative List is already a prize for some local or regional authority within a large country."


Els Slots 29 June 2025

Hi Twobaconsandaboston! There is indeed a strategy to give preference to countries that have not yet had a site inscribed. Within the yearly maximum of 35 new WHS to be discussed, they get a higher priority than the 61st site of Italy. However, this system does not work very well as (a) often there are fewer than 35 new candidates, so no prioritization has to take place, and (b) the 'new' countries often submit dossiers that are either incomplete or lacking (because they are inexperienced or don't have much budget).


Twobaconsandaboston 29 June 2025

I have not digested each site yet to determine if any in particular stand out to me, other than potentially mapping out my visit list. I do note though that both Kuwait and Somalia have continued to add to their tentative lists whilst each of them have yet to have an inscribed site. It may have been covered in other blogs (which I have not found) but is there a trend to prioritise countries nominations that do not have any inscribed sites, similar to the policy (it appears) of prioritising sites in conflict zones? And further I would wonder why each state party does not progress existing TWHS to get their first inscribed site, rather than just adding to the Tentative List? There are only 28 State Parties out of 196 to the WHC that have no inscribed sites.